Nutrition Reviewed

How we review supplements

These reviews help readers compare information. They are not clinical recommendations or an independent laboratory certification.

1. Identify the exact product

We record the product name, version, target market, serving size and date checked. We use the manufacturer’s current label information where available and flag discrepancies. A statement about an older formula is not automatically carried into a new review.

2. Separate the evidence

We distinguish finished-product trials, trials of particular ingredients or extracts, observational work and mechanistic explanations. Manufacturer claims and customer testimonials do not substitute for controlled evidence. We link research so readers can inspect the population, preparation, dose, duration and outcome.

3. Compare practical differences

We consider disclosed quantities, capsule count, nutrient overlap, warnings, checkout cost and the availability of relevant quality information. A quality certificate is useful only for the product, batch and tests it actually covers.

4. Make the commercial interest visible

Nutrition Reviewed shares ownership with Testogen and benefits from its sales. That relationship appears prominently on product content. Testogen is subject to the same discussion of evidence limitations and safety considerations as other brands. We do not claim editorial independence from the owner.

5. Avoid precision we cannot substantiate

We do not award invented clinical scores, publish fabricated experiences, label a product “best” on the basis of a commission, or promise a testosterone increase. “Best” in a guide title describes the reader’s comparison question; the article explains the criteria and limits rather than manufacturing a winner.

6. Correct and update

Material changes to a formula, source or conclusion should trigger a review and an updated checked date. We do not automatically refresh dates without checking the content. Known unresolved discrepancies are stated in the relevant article.